Jump to content

Yet another fraudulent study from a "respected" journal (this time: Nature, 2006, Alzheimer’s)


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, KHashmi317 said:

As reported recently on Joe Rogan:

No doubt taking advantage of Nature's vulnerability, its main  rival Science reports:


Hi Khurram!

Yes; that's for real.  Lesné has been doctoring images in bogus papers on Alzheimer's for a long time.  There were previous posts in this group about this character -- I'm inclined to say "crook".

  --  Saul Lubkin


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2022 at 2:44 PM, Gordo said:

The most likely explanation, according to Cambridge University mathematician Sarah Rasmussen, is that the authors purposely submitted a ridiculous paper in order to expose "predatory journals" that purport to be normal, peer-reviewed publications, but in reality apply little scrutiny to material that they publish, often in order to collect publication fees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...