InquilineKea Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 (edited) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abwSdYqfU3M ========== https://www.rapamycin.news/t/what-are-your-oral-microbiome-oral-health-periodontal-exam-scores-how-deep-are-your-gum-pockets/5790/4 (more on diagrams here) =========== Species Relative abundance Percentile Associations Streptococcus mitis 11.6875 57.75% COMMENSAL Haemophilus parainfluenzae 10.7765 92.68% COMMENSAL NITRATE Porphyromonas sp 9.6302 96.81% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus infantis 6.2127 90.70% COMMENSAL Streptococcus sp 5.7931 77.97% BEING INVESTIGATED Aggregatibacter segnis 4.6343 100.00% BEING INVESTIGATED Prevotella nanceiensis 4.6170 86.20% BEING INVESTIGATED Neisseria flavescens 3.9802 79.22% COMMENSAL NITRATE Streptococcus oralis 3.8774 85.87% BEING INVESTIGATED Neisseria sicca 3.1319 89.68% BEING INVESTIGATED Neisseria subflava 3.0142 74.71% COMMENSAL Neisseria mucosa 2.3603 62.74% COMMENSAL Haemophilus haemolyticus 1.9707 82.14% COMMENSAL Aggregatibacter sp 1.7470 99.64% BEING INVESTIGATED Neisseria elongata 1.6081 95.49% BEING INVESTIGATED Haemophilus paraphrohaemolyticus 1.5068 96.65% BEING INVESTIGATED Fusobacterium nucleatum 1.4018 84.93% GUT INFLAMMATION HALITOSIS GUM INFLAMMATION Veillonella parvula 1.2857 72.92% BEING INVESTIGATED Prevotella pallens 1.2179 47.13% COMMENSAL Granulicatella adiacens 0.8792 89.89% HALITOSIS Morococcus cerebrosus 0.8313 81.01% BEING INVESTIGATED Gemella morbillorum 0.8203 93.06% BEING INVESTIGATED Fusobacterium periodonticum 0.8122 38.80% BEING INVESTIGATED Gemella haemolysans 0.6573 63.80% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus pneumoniae 0.6396 47.46% BEING INVESTIGATED Bacteroidetes oral 0.6165 92.69% BEING INVESTIGATED Catonella morbi 0.6036 95.89% BEING INVESTIGATED Prevotella melaninogenica 0.5889 18.07% BEING INVESTIGATED Eikenella corrodens 0.5443 97.40% HALITOSIS Prevotella nigrescens 0.5275 75.71% HALITOSIS Streptococcus cristatus 0.5266 94.08% COMMENSAL Rothia mucilaginosa 0.5258 7.56% COMMENSAL NITRATE Haemophilus sputorum 0.5215 71.72% BEING INVESTIGATED Veillonella sp 0.5074 15.38% BEING INVESTIGATED Haemophilus sp 0.5005 90.52% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus sanguinis 0.4951 51.51% COMMENSAL Prevotella sp 0.4811 19.68% BEING INVESTIGATED Capnocytophaga sputigena 0.4659 88.47% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus oligofermentans 0.4650 96.78% BEING INVESTIGATED Granulicatella elegans 0.4495 63.20% HALITOSIS Prevotella loescheii 0.4426 94.00% BEING INVESTIGATED Haemophilus parahaemolyticus 0.3900 73.03% BEING INVESTIGATED Porphyromonas catoniae 0.3631 92.43% BEING INVESTIGATED Rothia aeria 0.3619 56.02% COMMENSAL Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae 0.3259 46.79% BEING INVESTIGATED Actinomyces sp 0.3234 3.62% BEING INVESTIGATED Cardiobacterium hominis 0.3053 86.86% BEING INVESTIGATED Aggregatibacter aphrophilus 0.2892 78.02% BEING INVESTIGATED Capnocytophaga sp 0.2455 75.01% BEING INVESTIGATED Haemophilus influenzae 0.2388 84.25% BEING INVESTIGATED Lautropia mirabilis 0.2218 64.67% BEING INVESTIGATED Capnocytophaga gingivalis 0.2182 53.00% BEING INVESTIGATED Neisseria polysaccharea 0.2130 82.52% BEING INVESTIGATED Rothia dentocariosa 0.1989 20.22% BEING INVESTIGATED Corynebacterium durum 0.1834 68.55% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus tigurinus 0.1831 60.10% BEING INVESTIGATED Haemophilus pittmaniae 0.1699 82.65% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus parasanguinis 0.1679 10.48% COMMENSAL Streptococcus gordonii 0.1580 68.52% COMMENSAL Neisseria sp 0.1575 49.53% BEING INVESTIGATED Prevotella scopos 0.1458 41.56% BEING INVESTIGATED Eubacterium sulci 0.1443 27.40% BEING INVESTIGATED Capnocytophaga ochracea 0.1275 77.43% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus australis 0.1212 33.48% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus intermedius 0.1177 53.15% BEING INVESTIGATED Propionibacterium propionicum 0.1151 77.07% BEING INVESTIGATED Eubacterium brachy 0.0929 52.14% HALITOSIS GUM INFLAMMATION Leptotrichia goodfellowii 0.0820 72.49% BEING INVESTIGATED Parvimonas sp 0.0801 51.97% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus vestibularis 0.0751 33.79% BEING INVESTIGATED Capnocytophaga granulosa 0.0739 40.63% COMMENSAL Actinomyces viscosus 0.0659 19.04% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus sinensis 0.0621 74.25% BEING INVESTIGATED Prevotella shahii 0.0513 8.80% BEING INVESTIGATED Leptotrichia sp 0.0481 10.94% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus anginosus 0.0470 36.36% BEING INVESTIGATED Tannerella sp 0.0468 22.30% BEING INVESTIGATED Campylobacter gracilis 0.0429 62.99% GUM INFLAMMATION Solobacterium moorei 0.0427 33.13% HALITOSIS Actinomyces johnsonii 0.0341 34.29% BEING INVESTIGATED Tannerella forsythia 0.0269 15.56% HALITOSIS GUM INFLAMMATION Prevotella saccharolytica 0.0266 35.74% BEING INVESTIGATED Fusobacterium sp 0.0259 13.70% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus salivarius 0.0248 3.24% COMMENSAL Veillonella atypica 0.0246 1.57% COMMENSAL NITRATE Oribacterium sp 0.0240 5.46% BEING INVESTIGATED Streptococcus peroris 0.0235 7.38% BEING INVESTIGATED Treponema medium 0.0233 25.43% BEING INVESTIGATED Treponema sp 0.0231 29.15% BEING INVESTIGATED Actinomyces odontolyticus 0.0227 1.87% BEING INVESTIGATED Actinomyces massiliensis 0.0209 19.91% BEING INVESTIGATED Clostridiales bacterium 0.0208 8.29% BEING INVESTIGATED Veillonella dispar 0.0194 0.60% NITRATE Candida sp 0.0033 37.05% HALITOSIS Candida dubliniensis 0.0021 47.16% HALITOSIS Candida albicans 0.0009 51.36% HALITOSIS Candida glabrata 0.0006 66.31% HALITOSIS Helicobacter pylori 0.0005 23.79% BEING INVESTIGATED Edited March 2 by InquilineKea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InquilineKea Posted March 2 Author Report Share Posted March 2 They recommended I take this: Take S. Salivarius K12 Probiotics 1x per night for 8 weeks at the end of your hygiene routine High confidence WHAT IT HELPS WITH Bad breath Gum inflammation HOW IT WORKS Streptococcus salivarius is a commensal bacteria that is associated with good oral (and even systemic) health. BLIS K12 is a specific strain of bacteria called Streptococcus salivarius K12 which can be found naturally in the mouth and throat of some healthy adults and children. While everyone has Streptococcus salivarius bacteria, it is not as common to have the specific beneficial BLIS K12 strain. WHERE TO FIND S. Salivarius K12 Probiotic - get them through us for over 20% off! REFERENCES 1 Contribution of Probiotics Streptococcus salivarius Strains K12 and M18 to Oral Health in Humans: A Review 2 Streptococcus salivarius inhibits immune activation by periodontal disease pathogens 3 The Effect of Streptococcus salivarius K12 on Halitosis: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 4 Bristle research: Your guide to oral probiotics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corybroo Posted November 5 Report Share Posted November 5 While roaming around the web today, I came across LANAP (Laser-Assisted New Attachment Procedure) which was new to me. This is a procedure to treat periodontal disease. Does anyone have any familiarity with it? Thanks Some references: Immediate Effects of Laser-Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP) on Human Periodontitis Microbiota The LANAP surgical treatment protocol, but not conventional ultrasonic root debridement alone, immediately suppressed red and orange complex periodontal pathogens below culture detection limits in most deep human periodontal pockets. The Clinical and Microbiological Effects of LANAP Compared to Scaling and Root Planing Alone in the Management of Periodontal Conditions Both nonsurgical periodontal therapies were proven effective in patients with chronic periodontal disease; however, LANAP was associated with a greater reduction in pocket depth and improved clinical outcomes, associated with a significant decrease in the amount of Porphyromonas gingivalis. The clinical results included a decrease in periodontal pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and dental plaque, with LANAP having better overall outcomes than SRP alone. Tooth Retention and Clinical and Radiographic Long-Term Results Among Patients Treated with the Full-Mouth Laser-Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP): A Case Series There are limited long-term treatment results for patients who receive full-mouth laser-assisted new attachment procedure (LANAP). Clinical changes in iPD were more significant among premolars and molars when followed up for a period of less than 7 years. Tooth retention after full-mouth LANAP treatment was favorable in this cohort of private practice patients. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.