Mike Lustgarten Posted February 11 Report Share Posted February 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Put Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Thanks Mike! My EGFR is always above 100, and my creatinine is low. I can do about 55 push-ups these days, so not worried about muscle mass too much, even though I am pretty lean (11% fat). But wondering if it's worth testing Cystatin C, since I have never done it and don't have a base to compare future measurements against. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgorF Posted February 14 Report Share Posted February 14 (edited) I though for several years about starting to track cystatine c due to my low absolute creatinine (low body frame, low protein plants only diet) that creates too good (to be trusted) egfr but somehow missed out to start it, so finally this video motivated me to at least establish an own baseline. I think it makes sense to track the triad - adding also nt-probnp as a widely available thing to these two markers. A kind of motivation - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7907483/ Level and Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Kidney Function and Survival to Age 90 Astrid D Häberle, DDS, MSc,1 Mary L Biggs, PhD,2 Mary Cushman, MD, MSc,3 Bruce M Psaty, MD, PhD,4,5 Anne B Newman, MD, MPH,6 Michael G Shlipak, MD, MPH,7,8 John Gottdiener, MD,9 Chenkai Wu, PhD, MPH, MS,10,11 Julius M Gardin, MD,12 Nisha Bansal, MD, MSc,13 and Michelle C Odden, PhD1 Br, Igor Edited February 14 by IgorF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.